Intellectual scientific culture obscures human understanding of science itself. Furthermore, it overshadows all alternative methods of knowledge, particularly philosophical ones, which can provide greater certainty than scientific methods. Although philosophy and science overlap at the time, they are both fundamentally different in their approaches to our understanding. As such, philosophers should not be added to the conceptual confusion that reduces all knowledge to science. Rather, we should emphasize the fact that most disciplines are usually treated as scientific training, or at least if not more philosophical than scientific. For example, mathematics, psychology, economics and theoretical physics. These disciplines were to be primarily conceptual-rational, meaning that they relied primarily on empirical observation of humans. Unlike science, which can be conducted sitting in an armchair with your eyes closed. To this extent, Plato invented a theory of vision that involves three streams of light, one coming from the eyes, one coming from what is seen, and one coming from the light source. Plato marveled at mathematics, primarily a science in which Plato found certainty, precision, and necessity (Plato, 1985). Through science, he found a basis of knowledge that possessed the same certainty and unity as mathematics. Plato's work on Meno can be seen as proving that the connection between science and philosophy is mutual and characterized by ever deeper interaction. Consistent with the belief that philosophy should be pursued only through the acquisition of pure knowledge (science), Plato proposed the study of astronomy as an exact mathematical science based on the hypothesis that the movements were circular and regular. Plato wants to discover the truth behind appearances and believes that absolute truth cannot be derived (Plato,