-
Essay / Talk shows as a way to control people, but not just entertainment
Talk show is a television program or genre of programming consisting of either a single person or a group of people belonging to politics, media or any respectable profession and in this particular program they discuss various topics put forward by the host of this program. The television talk show is, in its essence, a somewhat unique organization. We pay people to speak for us. Like the musical drama, the talk show is a development of 20th-century broadcasting. It takes an exceptionally ancient type of communication and discussion and transforms it into an extremely important but extremely important type of information and stimulation through the foundations, practices and technologies of television. The talk show didn't start overnight, at a specific time or place. It grew out of forty long periods of television practice and conversational customs that were precursors to radio and famous theater. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”? Get the original essay Television talk shows initially grew out of two central traditions: news and entertainment. After a while, hybrid forms developed, mixing news, public affairs and entertainment. These mixed forms occupy a central place among news and entertainment, but their hosts (Phil Donahue, Oprah Winfrey and Geraldo Rivera, for example) have regularly trained in journalism. As they are recorded live, they will never repeat themselves intentionally, and have the basic flavor of spontaneity for television. These programs are supposed to be uncertain and unscripted, and viewers around the world watch them to perceive the end result, see what the guest of these talk shows will say, and these viewers will listen to them for quite a while or week after week . . Since these talk shows are reality based and discuss the most trending topic, most of the time the guests end up fighting with each other and using abusive language against each other without considering the makes these talk shows broadcast live across the country and around the world. world. This slang and abusive language can have a negative impact on society, nation and the world because the people sitting there are actually representing their country, culture, norms and ethics. It was analyzed how the language used by guests in the talk shows are identified with personal communication, portraying no sense of social order. We learn our language from everyone around us. Most of us think of this as implying that we can first learn the language from our parents, but as we become more established, other relatives, friends, teachers and even the media, especially talk- shows, affect our vocabulary and our decisions about the language we use. . Language exercises a hidden power, like the moon over the tides. – Rita Mae Brown The language we speak shapes the way we see the world, the way we think, and the way we live our lives. Knowing that language is of paramount importance in our social texture, we should try to be careful about the type and nature of language we use on our talk shows, whether from the guests or the host who use this language. The effect of language on our thinking and control cannot be ignored. an African quote: “It takes a village to raise a child. » This implies that raising a childis a shared effort. This means that what our media shows also has a great contribution to the education of our children and adolescents. Successful speakers recognize that in addition to choosing words that contribute to clarity and vividness, it is important to think about the connotations associated with a word or phrase. the other. When speakers are not careful with word choice in this sense, it is possible to lose credibility with the audience and create the perception that you are someone when you may not be. Effective ones understand that in addition to choosing words that contribute to distinctiveness and clarity, it is very necessary to consider the meanings attached to a single word or the other. When speakers are not careful about choosing words in this sense, it is conceivable to lose their trustworthiness to viewers and audiences and make it clear that you are someone who is probably not you in reality. During so many talk shows or news programs, no linguistic standards are followed and unethical and misleading words are used, to which our youth are very exposed. In reality, they fail to learn the art of conceptual and complex ideas. There is a great need for the family as a settlement unit, society as a network and the educational framework as the backbone of the nation to come together resolutely to transmit and maintain appropriate linguistic ethics in talk -shows. The problem with television talk shows, in the majority of countries The case, is that they are a kind of reality television that does not seem moral, but which also seems to attract an extremely loyal audience. Projects like talk shows with the contribution of the general population, with the association of core groups of spectators, seem to constitute another kind of television pleasure: a pleasure characterized by basic biographies, of simple individuals who can improve the situation after their appearance on television. Additionally, it creates trust; it makes you want to “look extraordinary on TV”. This thought touches an extremely sensitive point these days; to be more precise, reality shows make the intensity of viewer engagement. The price to pay is the presence of a greater number of television channels with a security stance that implies a moral methodology. Likewise, what we can undoubtedly see is that television creators are particularly aided by advertisers, and such a circumstance establishes a treacherous connection between the viewer and television. Manipulation comes into play here. A seriously advanced TV show and an extraordinary image advantage among people in the general space will surely occupy a large part of the audience. At the moment, there are many TV channels, most of them with general vision projects, and some of them focus on news programs. The question is asked considering that in the historical context of television, there are many dialogues about how the general public reflects their morality on/through the television screen. As Tony Krijnen pointed out, "even if there are enough voices to claim the importance of television in building a common ethical society, television is still expected to influence the bringing together of the deep quality of people.” How is creative capacity called upon by a television screen and its characters? This is fundamental when we talk about a reasoning point of view: the more viewers sit in front of the TV, the more their creative capacity works with the experts of.