I will explain Hempel's Raven Paradox with respect to how it affects the philosophical project of making sense of the workings of science and its problems of induction. I will discuss and explain Hempel's Raven Paradox, I will also demonstrate how the Raven Paradox works as it relates to science. I will explain what a strong inductive argument is, what a weak inductive argument is, what induction is, and how it makes sense of how science works. I will also explain what deduction is so that there is knowledge of the meaning. of induction and deduction in more detail. I will use the example of paradox and its proposed questions in the process of generalization and falsifiability. I will also use examples derived from other philosophers' views on induction from my readings of their work. The traditional “problem of induction” was having the ability to actually justify induction. Indeed, showing that induction works (normally universal induction leads to this), from premises being true to conclusions being true. Induction is the process of observing particular instances of a general law or principle and inferring from them, as opposed to deduction. For example, you can say that__________________________________if all F's are X and all X's are G then all F's are also G, this is the same as saying if all what is called a strong inductive argument. We speak of inductive reasoning when the premises aim to provide solid evidence to find the truth of the conclusion. A deductive argument is a definite truth whereas an inductive argument is a probable truth based on known information/evidence. An inductive environment......e because it helps make sense of problems seen in science in a philosophical way. There are a few places in science, like when a theory must be accurate before it is put into practice, because if it isn't the consequences could be drastic, it's in things like this- here that the paradox is not useful as such because it needs a finer approach. details. If Hempel's Raven paradox is an asset to science in defining its philosophical projects to make sense of it all, the paradox offers a simple explanation of how to score many theories and hypotheses for which it would be difficult , if not impossible, to obtain the necessary information to obtain the necessary information. refute it. It also provides a way to use it to put it into physical practice within science. Hempel's Raven paradox has an effect in the way science works, it is not radical but still affects it in its own way..