Table of ContentsIntroductionEthical Dilemma DiscussionConclusionIntroductionIn the field of data innovation, step by step, the different cases that are not illicit are expanding, but they are completely related in as a moral question. In this report, I might like to talk about a case identified with such a moral issue and the effect that partners have on this moral issue. Perhaps I would like to talk about the ACS code of morality by also identifying with this moral issue. Brief description of the case studyTom, who was a student of database administration framework, started his own consulting firm two years ago. Soon after starting the business, he grew to the point where many people now work for him and he also has many clients. More and more frequently, its consulting programs integrate how to configure corporate intranets, planning management frameworks and, in addition, informing its clients about the best security for their system. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”? Get the original essay Currently, for several days, Tom describes a database administration framework for the Record division of a mid-sized advertising organization. Tom made all the outlines of the database administration framework required for the workplace, he also trained the head of record and the president of the promoting organization regarding the advancement of the framework . Right now, it's a matter of deciding on choices regarding the types and level of security to assemble the frame. For this, Tom had described the different security frameworks available to the client on the market. According to its description, the customer found that the frame with this security frame would cost more. Since the frame would cost that much more than what they had previously anticipated, the customer opted to go with a cheaper secure frame that was less expensive. anchor. Tom is convinced that the data the framework will contain has real meaning and is also incredibly delicate. This incorporates the organization's savings record as well as all of the organization's staff, pay rates, payslip data and more. If the organization has such an impotent security framework, then representatives who destroy that framework might have the ability to make sense of approaches to access essential documents. Tom believes the setting should have had a strong security framework. In light of this, he endeavored to clarify the dangers that can arise without a solid security framework, but the chief, director of the promoting organization, stated that our framework is not associated on the web so that there be no shooting. hacking efforts within our framework. Either way, he couldn't care less about the chances of reserves for the worker working for him. As a result, he finally needed Tom to create a less entrenched security framework for his organization. Currently, Tom is in trouble and doesn't know what he should do now. He finally chose and made the frame with low security. A few months later, it is discovered that the organization was hacked by one of the organization's employees. All crucial records and points of interest were stolen and desecrated. Now here is a moral question: Who is to blame? Who will oversee each of these misfortunes? Ethical Dilemma Discussion This matter requires a very moral exchange. We are not quite the same as each other and we havevarying individual impacts on our morality, but as a vocation we share a typical methodology, namely the Australia PC Society (ACS) Code of Morals. For this situation, many basic circumstances appear here, the same number of sets of accepted rules of the Australian Figuring Society (ACS) have been damaged. As noted by ACS, there is code for Open Intrigue. Within this code, we try to safeguard the reliability, security, progress and usefulness of ICT. When we think about it, we can see that this moral code was not respected. For the most part, the commitment to protect the classification and security of others' data has also not been respected. Additionally, as ACS states, you must understand and respect the perspectives of those who are influenced by your work. This decision was not pursued. This is a truly deceptive action that has particularly embarrassed both organizations. In this case, I discovered that, just like an IT expert, Tom, the manager of the organization responsible for administering the database, was no longer trusted in his activities. He couldn't have cared about the moral code of conduct and ultimately, he chose to experience what the president wanted. Being computer proficient, one minds one's own business and must follow the right method of doing things which are stated in the ACS code of morality with the aim that no one falls victim to any sort of tasks. Despite the fact that he clarified the conceivable risk that the WCC could soon face. Ultimately, he should have looked for the right path, not just what customers need. This was not the appropriate method for an expert reaction. With this action we can see that he does not have the right to call as a perfected computer skill. He was not following the correct path that he should be doing, as indicated by the set of ACS principles. Additionally, being the head of the advertising organization also helped secure and advance the delicate part of the framework. With his thoughtlessness, the majority of alternate representatives are influenced. He did not understand his representative and did not give him due respect. So this bothered each of the workers and customers of this organization and the owner was particularly influenced by this matter. This was the fundamental moral case. Looking at what should have been done, we can see that Tom, the leader of the database administration organization, should have refused to take on the challenge because he realized that the task was not wouldn't last long. Regardless, he should have more choice and consideration regarding what is happening and what the results of this activity will be. He should have understood who will be influenced and how. He should have worked to convince the president that he needed to introduce strong security into the framework. Regardless, Tom should have found the best alternative for the President, by telling him about the equally shabby but solid security framework. Along with this, he could have taken the entire project within the safety framework and then started the task only if the client is satisfied with his agreement. This, in turn, would have limited the risk of such moral problems emerging. Keep in mind: this is just a sample. Get a personalized article from our expert writers now. Get a Custom Essay Conclusion To summarize, from this background investigation, we arrived at examinations that developer Tom should have followed the ACS code of behavior in his vocation without seeking individual benefit alone. This case also concerns the leader who.