As we have discussed above the cases of Indian journalists where they had died, in some cases the attackers shot them in front of their houses and others died when they cut their throats, but in all cases it was clear that the reason they were killed, although in the case of Gauri Lankesh the judgment is still pending, but in four other cases they died because of their profession, when a journalist reported against someone, the opposition party assassinated them, that means they were they did something wrong and when the journalists tried to kill them free them, they killed them. As I said in my introduction, today the general public is more influenced by right-wing groups or sometimes by left-wing groups and when a journalist says something about this or writes something about that, people begin to criticize him and he finally has to give his life. For this, people start thinking that if someone says or writes something, they should check the facts and figures before criticizing a journalist. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”? Get an original essay As they say that journalism is the golden career and in India it is called the fourth pillar of democracy, so why not. The number of journalists killed increases every year. Why we don't tolerate it much. Sometimes political parties also use journalists for their work and once their work is done, they let them kill them. Sometimes, when elections are approaching or it is visible that entire media outlets are behind them, they provide financial support to the family of deceased journalists. , they also only support those they know they could get votes from in the future. As the same thing happened in the case of Gauri Lankesh when she was dead, Tripura CM of communist party came in protest and demanded immediate action because Gauri Lankesh had some kind of leftist ideology , they say. But the chief minister did not even visit Shantanu Bhaumik's house when he was killed in Tripura state, so somewhere there is a visible difference in politicians supporting the death of their use. Although in Uttar Pradesh and Jharkhand the chief minister provides financial support to the family of journalists after their death, the main thing is that the government does not pass any law for the safety of journalists. Even news channels and media trusts are not doing well for the safety of journalists, we organize protests after the death of a journalist but we do nothing special for them when they were alive and that they were doing their job. The Indian Federation of Working Journalists also called on Rajyavardhan Singh Rathore, the then Minister of Information and Broadcasting, to announce a "risk insurance scheme" of at least 1 cr. So that the journalist's family does not have any problems in the future, but the ministry has not announced anything like this. And this is not just India's problem, as we lose 12-13 journalists every year and this number is increasing day by day. day. According to data from UNESCO and other non-profit organizations, our country India is the third most dangerous country in the world. So that means there are two other countries where the situation is worse than us for journalists and news creators. And this year, even our neighboring country Pakistan also lost its seven journalists, which means that yes, it is not only the problem of our.